Bring strategy research, backtest assumptions, live results and due diligence questionnaire (DDQ) evidence into one review. Track changes, supporting records and unanswered questions.
ContactDoes the live record include the same fees and funding assumptions?
Strategy comparisons on agreed definitions
DDQ answers linked to sources
Open questions and a recorded decision
Product view
Compare the records on agreed terms and keep unanswered DDQ questions visible to the review team.
What it covers
A comparison can turn on the period selected, the fees included or the way risk is measured. Give reviewers a consistent basis for the decision without flattening the differences that make each strategy distinct.
Bring the investment thesis, capacity and operating assumptions together. Compare strategies using agreed definitions while keeping their differences visible.
Align periods, fees, funding and leverage before comparing results. Trace material differences to execution conditions, strategy behavior or gaps in the record.
Reuse reviewed answers with their sources and dates. Route new or uncertain questions to specialists, and retain the approval record for what is shared.
In practice
A reviewer discovers that the backtest excludes funding while the live record includes it. The comparison is marked unresolved until costs and periods are aligned. The review then separates execution differences from the strategy’s underlying behavior.
Research, questionnaires, test outputs and permitted live records.
Periods, fees, funding and calculation definitions.
Assign material differences and unanswered questions.
Keep the reviewed evidence with the committee’s conclusion.
Implementation
Define the inputs, responsibilities and checks for your operation.
Corbel, configured for you
Share your research sources and review criteria. We’ll connect the evidence, comparisons and approval steps.